Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:58:07 -0500 From: "Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO" <myevmenkin@att.com> To: "'David Malone'" <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> Cc: julian@elischer.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: NETGRAPH patches (proposal) CONT. Message-ID: <E598F159668DD311B9C700902799EAF4473397@njb140po01.ems.att.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 09:02:43PM -0800, Archie Cobbs wrote: > > > > It's because all packets sent by this node should have the node's > > > address. If you don't have it then PPPoE cannot send a > packet "FROM" > > > thia node, as it has no idea of what this node's address is. > > > > So.. we can have two hooks, one that sets the host address and > > one that doesn't.. :-) > > In that case can we have one that also sets the destination address > via arp? > i added new control message for ``ngether_node''. i called it NGEF_RAW_MODE. now you can set it to on/off by using NgSendMsg. ``ngether_rcvdata'' will not update ``ether_shost'' if it set to on. otherwise it will. patches available at http://home.earthlink.net/~evmax/ng.tar.gz these are against -current cvsup'ed this sunday around 8:30pm EST. it also includes small test program based ion ``nghook''. Thanks, emax To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E598F159668DD311B9C700902799EAF4473397>