Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 12:15:35 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r324619 - in head/usr.bin/procstat: . tests Message-ID: <81c30f82-268e-ce59-4326-5a2f14ca62e5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201710141838.v9EIcaOQ047300@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201710141838.v9EIcaOQ047300@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14/10/2017 21:38, Brooks Davis wrote: > Author: brooks > Date: Sat Oct 14 18:38:36 2017 > New Revision: 324619 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/324619 > > Log: > Switch procstat from subcommand flags to verbs > > - Use an enumerated value instead of separate flags for commands > - Look for a verb if no command flag is set > - Lookup the "xocontainer" value based on the command > - Document the new command verbs in the man-page > > Submitted by: kdrakehp@zoho.com > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10916 What's the new way of doing procstat -kk -a ? procstat -kk -a now crashes because cmd is NULL when 'k' option is processed. procstat kstack and procstat kstack -v just produce the usage message without telling any specific usage error. procstat kstack -a says that 'a' is an illegal option. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?81c30f82-268e-ce59-4326-5a2f14ca62e5>