Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:57:31 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r273417 - head Message-ID: <86mw8ocftw.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <6287010D-9C54-4167-9784-84134080A419@bsdimp.com> (Warner Losh's message of "Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:02:49 -0600") References: <201410212029.s9LKThT2074337@svn.freebsd.org> <86d29k28wh.fsf@nine.des.no> <22788EC4-3BDF-40F3-ACAC-FA686ED21154@bsdimp.com> <86iojco2oh.fsf@nine.des.no> <6287010D-9C54-4167-9784-84134080A419@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > I would prefer calling this MK_ATF than MK_TESTS_SUPPORT, though. > > The test framework is probably useful on its own. > That would be a nicer name, but then we=E2=80=99d lose the automatic sett= ing > when MK_TESTS is enabled (unless we add another special case, which is > the opposite direction that I want to go in). How strongly do you feel > that=E2=80=99s a better name? Is _SUPPORT magic? I didn't know. I guess MK_TESTS_SUPPORT is good enough, especially if it's on by default. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86mw8ocftw.fsf>