Date: Thu, 24 Sep 1998 22:36:47 +0200 From: Stefan Eggers <seggers@semyam.dinoco.de> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@pipeline.ch>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, seggers@semyam.dinoco.de Subject: Re: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/3.0-19980923-BETA/ Message-ID: <199809242036.WAA13502@semyam.dinoco.de> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 Sep 1998 21:46:22 %2B0800." <199809241346.VAA20850@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Is there a need for (say): > > cvs-all (all commits) > cvs-30 (all commits related to 3.0 (aka -current, -beta, -stable etc) > cvs-22 (all commits related to 2.2.x (aka 2.2-stable etc) > cvs-ports (ports commits) > cvs-www (www tree) Splitting it this way looks OK to me and would be advantageous to me. Just the naming is a little bit unfortunate for -current and -stable as jkh already pointed out. ;-) But please don't forget digested versions. I'd like to read cvs-current (instead of cvs-all digestified which I get now) but don't want the overhead of getting everything in a separate email because that would increase telephone costs w/o giving me any real advantage. Stefan. -- Stefan Eggers Lu4 yao2 zhi1 ma3 li4, Max-Slevogt-Str. 1 ri4 jiu3 jian4 ren2 xin1. 51109 Koeln Federal Republic of Germany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809242036.WAA13502>