Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 22:39:10 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@magnesium.net> To: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/py-wxPython24 Makefile Message-ID: <4284134E.4040202@magnesium.net> In-Reply-To: <20050513014606.GA88528@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <200505122059.j4CKxGYI008314@repoman.freebsd.org> <4283D5EF.8070708@magnesium.net> <20050513014606.GA88528@voodoo.oberon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 06:17:19PM -0400, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >>Kirill Ponomarew wrote: >> >>>krion 2005-05-12 20:59:16 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> x11-toolkits/py-wxPython24 Makefile >>> Log: >>> Fix INDEX build. >>> >>> Revision Changes Path >>> 1.48 +1 -1 ports/x11-toolkits/py-wxPython24/Makefile >> >>This wxGTK stuff has been a pretty big change. Can the ports tree be >>completely thawed now? There have been a ton of changes, and I don't >>exactly see the point of us still being in a partial ports freeze. The >>FreeBSD GNOME team has been holding off on some updates (e.x. gettext) >>for the thaw. > > > Slush is over when RELEASE is announced, it's described on: > http://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/qa.html > > -Kirill If that's the answer I was looking for, I could have read it off the page myself. Perhaps I need to rephrase: why do we have a ports slush if we don't adhere to its terms? Please don't say "because it's the third item on the page." # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4284134E.4040202>