Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 11:55:21 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: smpatel@umiacs.umd.edu (Sujal Patel) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Latest Current build failure Message-ID: <199609031855.LAA04805@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960902230945.9398B-100000@mickey.umiacs.umd.edu> from "Sujal Patel" at Sep 2, 96 11:11:38 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Mon, 2 Sep 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > > > I haven't seen any real solutions to the buildable-current problem. > > > > Actually, I've been proposing a solution for close to 2 years now, > > we've just never actually set about the process of implementing it. > > Perhaps it's just me, but I really don't expect current to build all the > time. It's just a fact of life... That's why it's called -current. > > If you really need something that's in -current, then just wait for the > 2.2 SNAPS, they are fairly regular. So make up a name somewhere between "-current" and "2.2 SNAPS", with the primary criteria being that you expect it to build all the time. Then we can complain about that. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609031855.LAA04805>