Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 17:10:46 +0200 (MET DST) From: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD current users) Subject: Re: make fails Message-ID: <199606241510.RAA03109@allegro.lemis.de> In-Reply-To: <199606241426.AAA27040@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Jun 25, 96 00:26:32 am
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Bruce Evans writes: > >> Wouldn't it be more appropriate to print out the ld invocation line >> too? > > No more than to add -v to CFLAGS. Well, I'd think that you should either print both the cc -c invocation and the ld invocation, or neither. It's very confusing to just leave some of them out. Personally, I'm for having them both there. > @ is often misused in makefiles, but one running current should be > able to run make -n to see exactly what make would do. Sure. How long does a make -n world run for? Does it really descend properly into all subdirectories? Who expects this behaviour? The current situation is just plain misleading. Greghome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606241510.RAA03109>