Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:56:19 +1030
From:      "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To:        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Does anyone use nscd?
Message-ID:  <53BBCF50-2ACB-431B-9EED-0533A3F1BE78@gsoft.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <86sjn84wco.fsf@ds4.des.no>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


On 05/10/2011, at 1:50, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> I ask because when I cleaned up a slew of aliasing bugs a couple of
> years ago, I believe I may have introduced a bug; I got exactly two
> complaints, and neither of the complainants could be bothered to try the
> workaround I suggested and report back.
> 
> Although the code quality is atrocious, nscd is actually a pretty good
> idea.  I suspect the reason why nobody uses it is that it's off by
> default and people simply don't know about it.  Besides nuking it, which
> would be a shame, we have a range of options, from "just fixing the bug
> so those who want to use it can" in one end to "finding someone willing
> to clean it up and maintain it and enable it by default" in the other.
> 
> (no, I'm not volunteering to maintain it)

I'd be interested in testing your workaround(s) :)

--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C








help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53BBCF50-2ACB-431B-9EED-0533A3F1BE78>