Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:51:27 +0300 From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net> To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CSS 1.X vs. 2.X attributes Message-ID: <200510111451.29515.danchev@spnet.net> In-Reply-To: <20051011080551.GV99170@submonkey.net> References: <20051010102511.GC2617@flame.pc> <200510111038.30921.danchev@spnet.net> <20051011080551.GV99170@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 11:05, Ceri Davies wrote: --cut-- > > > > What is our current policy (assuming we actually _have_ one) about > > > > using CSS 1.X vs. 2.X attributes in stylesheets for the web site? > > > > > > I think it's probably OK. They'll just get ignored by browsers that > > > don't understand them, and the alternative in this instance is to not > > > include it any way as I understand it. > > > > Please don't go for such experiments. It will open another can of worms, > > e.g. inter-browser inconsistencies thus different look'n feel. > > I have personally decided that browsers that don't conform to standards > don't matter to me any more; once they stop working on 50% of the web, > they might get fixed. I guess the FreeBSD Project might need to bend to > them. Grrr, doesn't stand this way. There is a great direffence between breaking standards (which is obviously not the case here) and not using or forcing those of them which are not supported widely yet among various clients. Also this is not the last resort option of yours, thus more challenges taken is an overkill. It is just an opinion of mine, it's up to you to. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu> fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510111451.29515.danchev>