Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:57:26 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 ObsoleteFiles.inc src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/mtree BSD.usr.dist src/etc/rc.d Makefile isdnd pcvt syscons src/release/picobsd/build picobsd src/share/man/man4 Makefile atkbd.4 kbdmux.4 pcvt.4 splash.4 vkbd.4 ... Message-ID: <446B8E36.8050902@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <32264.1147899148@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <32264.1147899148@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >In message <446B8A9A.800@elischer.org>, Julian Elischer writes: > > >>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> > > > > >>Since our users run -stable, not -current, that just means that the code >>was broken by someone, >>not that no-one is running it... >> >> > >Gee Julian, I thought you had mastered the difference between stable >and current by now, but just to make it clear: PCVT is still present >in -stable. > >In other words, there are at least a year (under current planning) >until FreeBSD 7.0 comes out, so if somebody wants to resurrect pcvt >they have a year to do so. > > Since stable users will want to upgrade to 7.x i a year or so, then it makes sense that an RFC about deleting features should be posted to -stable, and you shouod wait long enough for anyone to reply before deleting it.. I do not say it can't go, just that your trigger finger is a bit too quick.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?446B8E36.8050902>