Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:16:47 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: Andrey Simonenko <simon@comsys.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/92880: [libc] [patch] almost rewritten inet_network(3) function Message-ID: <CAGH67wR%2B227dMWF0hdc2GFrYmJi=xUWqpWsGkhPT_ngmwXTeeQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomcmWEBWAeBboomwqk3X0D09qGdXxyuw5yiuj0W5zkDbg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201210230840.q9N8e038066538@freefall.freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmomcmWEBWAeBboomwqk3X0D09qGdXxyuw5yiuj0W5zkDbg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> wrote: > ... don't suppose you want to throw this into a test case somewhere in the tree? > > The new ATF import would be ideal for this. :) Indeed. The only problem is that bsd.test.mk is missing so you can't really integrate testcases into the build *quite* yet, but I can work with you to write up/review the testcase; I have the missing ATF/test infrastructure pieces committed to perforce (but I broke things working on adding fixtures) and will be migrating everything over to github soon (so that way my hacking is more isolated and more collaboration can occur). Thanks! -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wR%2B227dMWF0hdc2GFrYmJi=xUWqpWsGkhPT_ngmwXTeeQ>