Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:43:42 +0800 From: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcin Cieslak <saper@saper.info> Cc: stefan.schmidt@stadtbuch.de, freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Jython 2.5.1 patchB Message-ID: <20100215104342.GA51043@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002150950220.26637@x.fncre.vasb> References: <20100215085703.GA40347@FreeBSD.cs.nctu.edu.tw> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1002150950220.26637@x.fncre.vasb>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:29:59 +0000, Marcin Cieslak wrote: >=20 > On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: >=20 > > Hi all, > > > > Here is the patch for updating Jython to 2.5.1: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~lwhsu/jython/jython.diff >=20 > Are we giving up ${PREFIX}/lib/jython${PORTVERSION:S/.//g} structure? I removed this just because I don't feel the actual need about that. But it's discussible, that's why I post the patch here to collect comments. > I think it's not that bad idea and worth dragging along. > What do you think? Both work for me, I personally I don't like the suffix because that might conflict with some program's default patch. But I'm totally OK if it gives more convenience on the other side. Best, Li-Wen --=20 Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu AT FreeBSD.org> http://lwhsu.org --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkt5JV0ACgkQQWsOOSiXsihokACghzKLTsb0lpY9STrJEIKdnbkA uQMAn1BSAfrEx3lYdGfcmmWxd1WsZAkV =w/Im -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgqxwSJOaUobr8KG--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100215104342.GA51043>