Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 05:26:59 -0400 (EDT) From: "kalin mintchev" <kalin@el.net> To: "Olivier Nicole" <on@cs.ait.ac.th> Cc: rsmith@xs4all.nl, freebsd@meijome.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raid or not raid Message-ID: <63121.74.2.36.140.1180085219.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <200705250841.l4P8fSSH031065@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <54316.74.2.36.140.1179892303.squirrel@mail.el.net> <61733.74.64.6.149.1180002606.squirrel@mail.el.net> <20070524152750.GB20309@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <62361.74.64.6.149.1180048287.squirrel@mail.el.net> <20070525125110.55444566@localhost> <63019.74.2.36.140.1180082245.squirrel@mail.el.net> <200705250841.l4P8fSSH031065@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> how come there is ad4s1b and ad4s1c when those names don't appear in the >> fstab or df? > > Very often ad4s1b will be the swap and ad4s1c the full slice. > > That is not an absolute rule, but it is very much recommended (at > least for ad4s1c) to keep it equivalent to the full slice. but there is ad4s1 (without [a-g]) - isn;t that the full slice? or ad4s1 is more like ad4 (only one slice) - cause if you notice on the output i sent in the previous message the kBps value is the same for ad4, ad4s1 and ad4s1g which (to me) it basically says that only the g partition is being accessed at that moment. thanks... > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?63121.74.2.36.140.1180085219.squirrel>