Date: Wed, 07 Jan 1998 04:12:23 GMT From: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly) To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, andreas@klemm.gtn.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LINT is missing examples for sio1-3 ? GENERIC does so Message-ID: <34b3ff5a.2710878@mail.cetlink.net> In-Reply-To: <199801060603.RAA30386@godzilla.zeta.org.au> References: <199801060603.RAA30386@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 6 Jan 1998 17:03:48 +1100, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> wrote: >>But what about showing also different instance/flag combinations? I >>don't see how it hurts to do that as separate entries if the >>alternative is to muddy a single entry to the point of confusion. > >OK, but the proposed change just copied lines from GENERIC to give >uninteresting differences in the port, irq and disable flag. > >Bruce Yeah, but some of us dim-witted users benefit from those examples which are so uninteresting to the intellectual elite. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34b3ff5a.2710878>