Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:28:56 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com To: Ken M <ken@mack-z.com> Cc: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: frebsd jails advice Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1812101223300.89222@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20181210171629.GA66232@ultron> References: <556380033.2269176.1544437025342.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <556380033.2269176.1544437025342@mail.yahoo.com> <20181210115829.GA35331@vps.markoturk.info> <fd0f9d99-baab-f4f5-74c3-757ae314358f@netfence.it> <20181210171629.GA66232@ultron>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018, Ken M wrote: > Depending on the ssh encryption format ssh -X can actually be slower than VNC. > > I offer a third suggestion, I find XRDP to be very handy combined with remmina. > > Ken > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 04:50:21PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> On 12/10/18 12:58 PM, Marko Turk wrote: >> >>> I suggest you install some VNC server inside the jails and then connect >>> with VNC viewer from the host. >> >> I disagree: it's too much trouble, it's slow, it's memory consuming. >> >> "ssh -X"ing into the jail works much better. >> >> Just my 2c. >> I agree with the ssh-ing. I have been doing this since 5.2 on bandwidths ranging from dial-up modem to my current 50mbps. Even on the modems response was always better than I can type. Detail on encryption that do not work would be most helpful. I have akways used RSA.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1812101223300.89222>