Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 11:32:11 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: erich@lodgenet.com (Eric L. Hernes) Cc: se@zpr.uni-koeln.de, erics@now.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/ibcs2 ibcs2_ioctl.h ibcs2_ipc.h Message-ID: <199510121832.LAA15637@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199510121730.MAA08152@jake.lodgenet.com> from "Eric L. Hernes" at Oct 12, 95 12:30:19 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Thanks for the information! > > > > It seems to strengthen my point, that > > mounting a System V file system under > > /compat/ibcs2 and using its bin and lib > > directories will not work in general ... > > I do more work than I care to admit on SCO. > I've used Xenix, Sco Unix, and now the OpenServer5 crap. > > Just as a matter of interest, how would you propose mounting > a Xenix filesystem? Xenix doesn't have nfs, and FBSD doesn't support > Xenix (or SysV for that matter) filesystems. You could possibly > mount a Xenix filesystem on an SCO Unix box and then nfs from there, > but if you already have an SCO machine, why do you need iBCS? With a local Xenix FS implementation. But this does not effect the fact that a relative root is used and lookups are done twice: so it doesn't matter *where* the FS is actually mounted. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510121832.LAA15637>