Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:28:53 +0100
From:      Simon Barner <barner@gmx.de>
To:        Aaron Siegel <bulk_mail@siegel-tech.net>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Porting Kolab
Message-ID:  <20050119132853.GF5051@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--kA1LkgxZ0NN7Mz3A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Aaron, thanks for your efforts! I am redirecting this to the right
mailing list (ports@freebsd.org), thus the full-quote.

Simon

P.S.: I follow that list quite closely, and I cannot recall a thread
      about porting Kolab/kgroupware.

Aaron Siegel wrote:
> Hello
>=20
> After years of watching the Kolab/kgroupware project I have finally decid=
e to=20
> give it a try. Unfortunately Kolab is distributed using Openpkg the reaso=
n I=20
> have put off installing the server. I do not want to use two different=20
> package management systems on my computer especially if one of them is a =
rpm=20
> based system. I have never liked using rpms even when I was running Red H=
at.=20
>=20
> I have decided to start the porting Kolab server to Freebsd I am hoping t=
o=20
> incorporate it into the ports collection and abandon the openpkg stuff. T=
here=20
> are people running  and developing Kolab on Freebsd system so I know ther=
e=20
> are not any system level compatibility problems. I have started  the port=
ing=20
> process by cross referencing the openpkg names to the FreeBSD ports. As o=
f=20
> now I only see two packages that require a  patch specific to Kolab,=20
> cyrus-imap and  apache. Kolab use five application that are not=20
> in the FreeBSD ports collection, fsl (a wrapper for ossp-l2), kolabd,=20
> kolab-webadmin, kolab-resource-handlers, and perl-kolab. These list are i=
n a  =20
> preliminary state, I have not cross referenced all the Perl packages yet =
nor=20
> have I confermined all the ports name match the openpkg names.
>=20
> Has anyone else thought of performing this port? Is there a discusion in =
the=20
> FreeBSD community on openpkg and how it may or may not be incorporated in=
to=20
> the system? =20
>=20
> Aaron

--kA1LkgxZ0NN7Mz3A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFB7mCVCkn+/eutqCoRAky7AKDSWBErI3Jsxt5usfqD0UH812MQDgCfcbPh
K4JE2tYZf4/64s8hh2NxgDo=
=BKeW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--kA1LkgxZ0NN7Mz3A--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050119132853.GF5051>