Date: Mon, 18 Sep 1995 22:25:59 -0700 From: Steven Wallace <swallace@ece.uci.edu> To: paul@freebsd.org Cc: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp), jkh@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-etc@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc rc Message-ID: <199509190526.WAA11426@newport.ece.uci.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Sep 1995 16:31:13 BST." <199509181531.QAA15420@server.netcraft.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> You mean: >> packages_startup= /usr/local/etc/rc.d > > Or even > > packages_startup= /etc/rc.local.d > > the point is, the sysadmin has control over local configuration issues. > If packages aren't used at all then there's no extra baggage. > Yeah, I think this is the way to go. That way there is control where all the startup files go, in /etc/rc.local.d or /usr/local/etc/rc.d or wherever your fancy may be. If I remember correctly, people aren't forced to put their packages into /usr/local, so why should they be forced to put the startup files in /etc? Steven
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509190526.WAA11426>