Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 09:28:48 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: Frank Bonnet <bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr> Subject: Re: 5.1 beta2 still in trouble with pam_ldap Message-ID: <20030523062848.GG17107@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <xzp4r3mxjrx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20030522184631.A23366@bart.esiee.fr> <xzp65o2zkhf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030522224850.GK87863@roark.gnf.org> <xzpof1uy28n.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030523060846.GC17107@sunbay.com> <xzp4r3mxjrx.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--RMedoP2+Pr6Rq0N2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 08:24:34AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> writes: > > On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:45:44AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > Gordon Tetlow <gordont@gnf.org> writes: > > > > I'm unfamiliar with ["binding"]. What's it do? > > > It behaves like "sufficient" should, i.e. failure is not ignored. > > You mean, _last_ failure is not ignored? >=20 > I don't understand the question. >=20 In a chain with mutiple "binding" modules, only the _last_ failure gets ignored? Meaning, if some other module succeeds, override the failure status, right? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --RMedoP2+Pr6Rq0N2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+zb+gUkv4P6juNwoRAsMGAJ4lyAzfIXJvpUzInZg4RL/Ir7UtjgCeIvxd XF5K7e4Uld1EMcxDWpbEtS0= =b9IC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RMedoP2+Pr6Rq0N2--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030523062848.GG17107>