Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Nov 2017 23:56:17 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 223752] clang __attribute__((constructor)) gets wrong input parameters
Message-ID:  <bug-223752-29464-1a6l35ws3D@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-223752-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-223752-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223752

--- Comment #7 from dstaesse <dimitri.staessens@ugent.be> ---
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #5)

Good point, we only tried amd64 and i386.=20

This feature seems to be very sparsely documented, with some sources saying
everything but void func(void) is undefined behaviour and others stating th=
at
it can have the same signature as the main() function. The GNU compiler
documentation doesn't give details and clang doesn't document it at all. I'=
ve
seen other projects use this, though.

The compiler doesn't seem to check the function signature at all, I've trie=
d to
set the constructor attribute to functions with all sorts of parameters and
complaints.

If this is undefined behaviour, do you know of a portable way to access argv
from a shared library without passing it as a function parameter to some in=
it
call?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-223752-29464-1a6l35ws3D>