Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 19:13:46 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-approval requested: [Bug 225744] [PATCH] defaulting x11-fonts/fontconfig no-bitmap.conf : [Attachment 191348] Proposed patch (since 463966 revision) Message-ID: <bug-225744-6497-TMypJ2acgu@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-225744-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-225744-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
lightside <lightside@gmx.com> has asked gnome@FreeBSD.org for maintainer-approval: Bug 225744: [PATCH] defaulting x11-fonts/fontconfig no-bitmap.conf https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D225744 Attachment 191348: Proposed patch (since 463966 revision) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D191348&action=3Dedit --- Comment #4 from lightside <lightside@gmx.com> --- Created attachment 191348 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D191348&action= =3Dedit Proposed patch (since 463966 revision) Hello. I think, possible to create NO_BITMAPS (or with different name) port's opti= on for proposed/committed changes in this PR. Also possible to convert files/patch-conf.d_Makefile.in to sed patch, becau= se of possible dynamic changes to conf.d/Makefile.in file after new version update(s), which may require to fix static patch otherwise. Attched new patch after ports r463966 changes. I added NO_BITMAPS to OPTIONS_DEFAULT as this PR proposed, but I don't know about whether this option should be enabled by default or not. Previously, = it was as fontconfig's developers configured by default. - Bump PORTREVISION - Add NO_BITMAPS option - Add OPTIONS_SUB=3Dyes and adapt pkg-plist - Convert files/patch-conf.d_Makefile.in to sed patch
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-225744-6497-TMypJ2acgu>