Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 07:37:43 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Strzelczyk <cs052279@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: kernel build question Message-ID: <20020327153743.38517.qmail@web14808.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I had buildkernel and installkernel this was just a typo in my email. -chris ================================================= Can anyone tell me if there is a major difference in compiling the old way or the new way? Do these do exactly the same thing? I have just finished trying to upgrade a 4.4-stable to 4.5-stable and when I boot I still get the 4.4-stable. This is what I did. rm -r /usr/obj rm -r /usr/src (except for my custom kernel) cvsup stable-supfile make buildworld KERNCONF=custom kernel (Finished successfully) make installworld KERNCONF=custom kernel (Finished successfully) I show that /kernel was last modified on Dec 14!?? So it's like these steps have not even touched the kernel. Thanks in advance. -chris __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards® http://movies.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020327153743.38517.qmail>