Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:19:10 -0400 From: Howard Goldstein <hg@queue.to> To: me@georgedonnelly.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Static Routes Questions Message-ID: <464DEE1E.70803@queue.to> In-Reply-To: <10687376.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <10687376.post@talk.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
georgedonnelly wrote: > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default 0.0.0.1 UGS 0 154237 em0 > 0.0.0/24 link#1 UC 0 0 em0 > 0.0.0.1 00:d0:03:15:7c:0a UHLW 2 0 em0 1155 > 0.0.0.40 00:30:48:88:d9:98 UHLW 1 41787 em0 1198 > 0.0.0.83 00:30:48:76:84:ac UHLW 1 3708 lo0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 77453 lo0 > > (real ips obscured) I find obscuration particularly with zeros a mind game because that first one is a network address and it adds needless confusion but set that aside... From the routing table it's clear that your /24 is on the same ethernet segment and if it is, which should be apparent from a traceroute, it is already doing direct routing and you don't need to do anything. If you traceroute from one server to the other one it will in the most common scenario indicate if they're routing without touching your colo.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?464DEE1E.70803>