Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:25:28 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: "Karl H. Beckers" <karl.h.beckers@gmx.net>, Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threading in FreeBSD (acx_pthreads) Message-ID: <86prvb24jr.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <200802041456.30785.jhb@freebsd.org> (John Baldwin's message of "Mon\, 4 Feb 2008 14\:56\:30 -0500") References: <5913.192.9.112.196.1202124683.squirrel@www.our-isp.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041157030.13899@sea.ntplx.net> <58004.192.9.112.196.1202145786.squirrel@www.our-isp.org> <200802041456.30785.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> writes: > Also, FWIW DES, at work when folks did benchmarks for Java stuff on > 6.x, libkse had better performance than libthr. Granted, Java is a > bit more of an odd benchmark b/c it is thread happy and thus more > suited to a M:N model than most other threading workloads. It was never a matter of performance. Varnish simply did not work with libkse. We had constant crashes under load which went away when we switched to libthr. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86prvb24jr.fsf>