Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:53:40 +0000 From: Tino Engel <elrap@web.de> To: icantthinkofone <icantthinkofone@charter.net> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: flash: linux firefox vs linuxpluginwrapper Message-ID: <473660A4.9080501@web.de> In-Reply-To: <47351141.4090209@charter.net> References: <cff9f2d10711091320q7825f190r8dc373b80155a9bd@mail.gmail.com> <4734D8B0.1060200@riderway.com> <4734DA4C.90702@riderway.com> <47351141.4090209@charter.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
icantthinkofone wrote: > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> >>> John wrote: >>> >>>> I've been struggling to get a handle on the FreeBSD system. Making >>>> good >>>> progress, but then I ran into the fact that Firefox on FreeBSD >>>> can't do >>>> flash. Definite showstopper, for me. Ok, then I tried to use the >>>> linuxpluginwrapper approach, and it didn't work. >>>> >>>> It made me recall, in reading up on FreeBSD, I did see where somebody >>>> installed both Firefox and Linx-firefox. >>>> >>>> So before I do battle with this Linux wrapper approach, I wondered >>>> if I >>>> would be better off simply installing the Linux-firefox? >>>> >>>> Is that easier? More likely to work? >>>> >>> http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2007-07/msg01919.html >>> >>> >> ----> cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-fc6 ; make install clean >> >> There is now: >> cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f7 ; make install clean >> which you should use instead -- its newer :) >> >> >> > btw, you don't need both native and Linux Firefox. Native Firefox an > do flash just fine. > _______________________________________________ Well, how can it? I cannot build linuxpluginwrapper, it alway fails saying: ===> linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_8 doesn't support ELF symbol versioning, yet.. *** Error code 1 I I am using RELENG_7 on i386.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?473660A4.9080501>