Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Nov 1996 17:14:52 -0800 (PST)
From:      Tony Li <tli@jnx.com>
To:        dan@dpcsys.com
Cc:        isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: changed to: Frac T3?
Message-ID:  <199611200114.RAA16629@chimp.jnx.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.UW2.3.95.961119164650.29471C-100000@cedb> (message from Dan Busarow on Tue, 19 Nov 1996 16:57:52 -0800 (PST))

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

   If you are running a web server, and maybe sendmail and popper, on this
   box it's probably not a real* router.  I bet it'll have a default
   route out the serial interface and a static route pointing at the interior
   network.

   If this is the case, should a P133 have any problems, even under heavy
   load?  I don't see how the choice between two routes would get in its way.

   * it's not going to be running gated or even routed

Well, obviously the static routes won't fall out if the box is overloaded.
So for that case, no problem.

Of course, as you say, it's not a Real Router (tm) ;-)

Tony





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611200114.RAA16629>