Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 16:34:15 +0100 From: Matthias Schuendehuette <msch@snafu.de> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IRQ-Routing for 5.3-BETA Message-ID: <200411111634.16225.msch@snafu.de> In-Reply-To: <419054C1.5050608@root.org> References: <200409232235.08683.msch@snafu.de> <200409252126.36670.msch@snafu.de> <419054C1.5050608@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Nate, Am Dienstag, 9. November 2004 06:25 schrieb Nate Lawson: > I MFC'd the change to RELENG_5 as well so if you can test there or on > 6-current, you should fine that the card works as before. The change > was to allow the SCI (irq 9 on PIC systems) to always be used for > devices, even if the ACPI _PRS setting for the device doesn't > explicitly allow it. I tried this in the moment but there's no change concerning my ISDN-Card. The isic(4)-device attaches either to IRQ9 or to IRQ10 (depending on my /boot/device.hints config), so the dmesg seems ok in either case... but the card *works* only on IRQ9. There are no other devices on IRQ9 (or IRQ10 resp.), but somehow these two Interrupt-lines behave differently. I have no problem with this any more since I found out that the card is working on IRQ9. I hope this remains for FreeBSD-5 at least... :-) -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette <msch [at] snafu.de>, Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at <pgp.mit.edu> and <wwwkeys.de.pgp.net> ID: 0xDDFB0A5F
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411111634.16225.msch>