Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 23:30:21 +0200 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>, marino@freebsd.org, =?UTF-8?B?QmVybmhhcmQgRnLDtmhsaWNo?= <decke@bluelife.at> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r367769 - in head: . emulators emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod-legacy emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy Message-ID: <540F716D.8020001@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <540F704B.7070209@FreeBSD.org> References: <201409091918.s89JIStw037486@svn.freebsd.org> <CAE-m3X0VobD6WDC94QtgDFhFrQ_dYuZ=mMO4iPTUy7k3juUgeQ@mail.gmail.com> <540F6D8A.30907@marino.st> <540F704B.7070209@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/9/2014 23:25, Bryan Drewery wrote: > virtualbox-ose-kmod-legacy does not have a dependency on unstaged > emulators/virtualbox-ose-legacy. Naturally decke@ was not notified. Okay, so the issue is the kmod port? I didn't realize it had a function by itself, I thought it existed solely for virtualbox-ose-legacy. > It is not proper to remove a port without a deprecation period if it > works and has no other reason to be removed. > > btw decke@ still is a portmgr. The language is inexcusable. If virtualbox-ose-kmod-legacy is useful by itself, I'm happy to restore it. John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?540F716D.8020001>