Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 20:29:49 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 279546] ctladm.8 is inconsistent about "ctladm port"'s "-l" option Message-ID: <bug-279546-227-dIt5Re0Prm@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-279546-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-279546-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D279546 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> --- It is hard to recall why have I done that 9 years ago, but it seems `ctladm port -l` is equivalent to `ctladm portlist`. And `-x` and `-q` arguments a= re useless without `-l`. I guess I could keep it in the code to not break existing scripts, while remove from documentation to make it more clear. M= ay be I was going to clean up code later, but it just never happened. I don't think I'd like restoring the documentation, preferring probably further cleanup. Whether to remove the actual code, I don't have preference. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-279546-227-dIt5Re0Prm>