Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 01:51:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Etienne de Bruin <et@quidel.com> Cc: "'chat@freebsd.org'" <chat@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Workstations Message-ID: <20030415015011.S2937@znfgre.tberna.bet> In-Reply-To: <CABF75E36A343E43A588BF9D8673D00A178F30@MAIL.kansas.us> References: <CABF75E36A343E43A588BF9D8673D00A178F30@MAIL.kansas.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Etienne de Bruin wrote:
> Greetings - Our company is considering a move to Red Hat as an alternative
> for Windows workstations and I would like to present a healthy reason why
> FreeBSD would be a 'better' OS to install on our work stations.
Here's a revolutionary idea... red hat may actually be a better desktop
OS that FreeBSD. Personally I'd be focusing on the joy that is removal of
more microsoft products. :)
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030415015011.S2937>