Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 01:59:40 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, jseger@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/lynx Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980127015727.24291A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199801262243.OAA01277@baloon.mimi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * You could use IGNORE_FILES= instead, if the changing file doesn't cause > * problems for other reasons. > > It does. I have seen patches fail in the past. There is no patches there! There is _official_ fixes set unpacked over old variant. > IGNORE_FILES won't help much for packages, because that means I will > not notice files being updated. Personally, I think Justin's attempt > to keep the files and checksum in sync (and in a manageable fashion, > remember that is exactly why lynx-current was split from lynx) is the > right way to go. In case he plan to update his local variant in reasonable rate. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nietzsche.net> http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980127015727.24291A-100000>