Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:22:39 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Dario Freni <saturnero@freesbie.org> Cc: geom@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CALL FOR TESTERS: geom_vol_cd9660 class Message-ID: <20050726202239.GJ46538@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <42E697E2.2050000@freesbie.org> References: <42E6903D.1040107@freesbie.org> <20050726200214.GH46538@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <42E697E2.2050000@freesbie.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--sRX2FdEyTtTKLbqH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:06:58PM +0200, Dario Freni wrote: +> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: +> > What's wrong with glabel(8)? +>=20 +> Honestly, I didn't know it before. Looking into NanoBSD code I saw it +> use GEOM_VOL, so I started investigate on geom_vol_ffs and write this +> tiny class. Agreeing with Andreas Kohn on current@: +>=20 +> <quote> +> But, the really important question is: why is there geom_vol_ffs and +> geom_label? Apparently I wasn't the only one who did not see +> geom_label :) +> </quote> That's actually my fault. I wanted to remove geom_vol_ffs long time ago to not confuse the users. To not make your work useless, could you verify iso9660 part of geom_label? Maybe I missed something there. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --sRX2FdEyTtTKLbqH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC5puPForvXbEpPzQRAtE5AJ9aAGCRkrEiZXjrM4XX3NqZeuaHfQCffi+Q 6KBjFGG9VZS2Xmwv1yT2LcI= =nVLI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sRX2FdEyTtTKLbqH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050726202239.GJ46538>