Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 22:02:49 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: piecemeal articles Message-ID: <xzphebj3gjq.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20030205.053129.78764236.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> (Hiroki Sato's message of "Wed, 05 Feb 2003 05:31:29 %2B0900 (JST)") References: <xzpsmv33k33.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030204201507.GA86389@nathan.ruhr.de> <20030205.053129.78764236.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hiroki Sato <hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> writes: > Udo already pointed out, you can read an article as a single file, > specifying "article.html" explicitly. For example: Ah! Thanks. > Hmmm... How about adding an anchor to the single html version into > the title page of the splitted version (and vise versa)? Sounds like a good idea, if it can be done cleanly. The split version is pretty useless for printing, for instance. BTW, as regards the PAM article, the legal notice (which I am required by contract to include in the article) is missing from the split version. To me, that alone is a very strong argument for having the unsplit version be the default. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzphebj3gjq.fsf>