Date: Tue, 19 Aug 1997 14:41:30 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@wup.de> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu> Cc: itojun@itojun.org, andreas@klemm.gtn.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: another make world compile problem, the previous is fixed Message-ID: <19970819144130.08010@wup.de> In-Reply-To: <199708191013.DAA20187@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>; from Satoshi Asami on Tue, Aug 19, 1997 at 03:13:18AM -0700 References: <639.871826920@itojun.csl.sony.co.jp> <199708191013.DAA20187@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 19, 1997 at 03:13:18AM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * I'm not familiar with /usr/src/usr.bin/vi policy, but... > * is it really necessery to compile in tcl interpreter into > * /usr/bin/vi? > * (I'm familiar with nvi itself) > > IMO, no (regardless of NOTCL setting). If people want a bloated vi > with tcl/tk/perl/whatever support built in, they can use the ports. To second that: Isn't there a vi on the fixit floppy ? I think, if tcl support get's compiled into the standard vi then there could arise space problems or am I wrong ? -- Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH phone: +49 2173 3964 161 Support Unix - Andreas Klemm fax: +49 2173 3964 222 An der alten Ziegelei 2 mail1: andreas.klemm@wup.de D-40789 Monheim mail2: andreas@FreeBSD.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970819144130.08010>