Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 12:07:40 -0500 From: "Stephane E. Potvin" <sepotvin@videotron.ca> To: grehan@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xorg-server build hack Message-ID: <45BA355C.5090400@videotron.ca> In-Reply-To: <45BA230C.2090900@freebsd.org> References: <45B9637E.1020900@freebsd.org> <45BA134B.9080608@videotron.ca> <45BA230C.2090900@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Peter Grehan wrote: > Hi Stephane, > >> I have a local patchset that I'm currently working on that add support >> for libgcc_s (shared libgcc) which might fix this problem. I have not >> tested it on powerpc but at least it's compiling (survives a make >> universe). If you want to give it a try just tell me and I'll send it >> to you. > > I don't know if it would help since Xorg config changes are required in > any case. The pic version of libgcc.a came about from amd64 since they > had similar issues to ppc with mixing static libs and pic libs. > > Were you seeing problems like this as well ? > I've done this to fix another problem which is not related to this one. I thought that it could help because the patch forces all library linking to be done against libgcc_s.so.1 instead of the static libgcc.a or libgcc_pic.a (there's no libgcc_pic.a anymore). The shared library shouldn't have any pic problems. Regards, Stephhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45BA355C.5090400>