Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 09:46:05 -0500 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> Subject: Re: [FreeBSD 5.3-RC2] Processes STILL hanging in unkillable state Message-ID: <20041104144605.GF24440@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <200411041534.30965.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <200411020143.34251.gte990t@mail.gatech.edu> <200411040329.21834.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <4189CCB8.2050104@alexdupre.com> <200411041534.30965.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 03:34:26PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> On Thursday, 4. November 2004 07:31, Alex Dupre wrote:
> > Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > > Could all people who are seeing this please post their kernel
> > > configurations, sysctl.conf and perhaps some system details (platform,
> > > UP/MP), too.
>
> Looking at all of these, I fail to see anything "special" that all these
> machines have in common - looks like there's a full range from tuned
> configurations with eyebrowraisers like PREEMPTION to almost-unmodified
> GENERIC and pretty different hardware, too. :(
>
> So if anybody spots something interesting here after all, or thinks Marc
> Ramirez backtraces / debug sessions reveal anything about the bug, please
> take over...
>
In particular if you manage to wedge processes in an unkillable state
the output of "ps -o f -l" might be useful. I'd like to see all of the
flags set for a process that gets wedged.
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041104144605.GF24440>