Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:13:20 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r204650 - head/share/man/man9 Message-ID: <201003031413.20685.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100303190551.GJ8200@hoeg.nl> References: <201003031849.o23InFJU034484@svn.freebsd.org> <20100303190551.GJ8200@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 03 March 2010 2:05:52 pm Ed Schouten wrote: > * Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > Log: > > Remove C99 initializer, since dominant style is to use non-C99 initializers. > > > > Requested by: jhb > > Maybe I'm flogging a dead horse, but this is 2010. Whether or not a > compiler supports C99 is no longer an issue. We're already far beyond > the point of going back to C89. The point is that if you look at almost all of the new-bus drivers in the tree, they do not use C99 initializers to initialize their KOBJ class. Given that, I do not see a reason to make driver(9) document a style that almost no drivers use. If we did want to do something different, we should use the DEFINE_CLASS_0() macro that can be used to declare a KOBJ class. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201003031413.20685.jhb>