Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 22:12:29 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> To: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: preadv() / pwritev() Message-ID: <20050425201229.GA92995@stack.nl> In-Reply-To: <20050425192949.GE769@empiric.icir.org> References: <20050425101008.GA57542@stack.nl> <20050425135044.GD769@empiric.icir.org> <20050425152314.GB58044@stack.nl> <20050425165041.GA71899@stack.nl> <20050425192949.GE769@empiric.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:29:49PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > More like this then... >=20 > Yep, something like that! Thanks, though I may not have time to commit > this at the moment. :-( Then should I file a PR after someone tells me what kind of naming scheme they'd rather have than dopreadv() and dopwritev() :-P ? Or should I combine all of the 4 read functions together (as well as all of the 4 write functions) ? The current patch is against 6-CURRENT, but applies almost perfectly against 5-STABLE as well, and works for me. ;-) Marc --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCbU8tezjnobFOgrERAi4pAJ9Zctw0SgnvV5w1dps/QaVse4G9BgCgu+q9 IiTCnS/o+942ygF4ilLmmj8= =4kTl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050425201229.GA92995>