Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 12:51:23 +0200 From: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [ports] r438901 causes PACKAGES= issues Message-ID: <5922C2AB.1060008@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <48dada64-42b9-9bff-1a6d-a18a34d9662a@freebsd.org> References: <5921DBB3.3010001@omnilan.de> <59228D90.4030909@omnilan.de> <48dada64-42b9-9bff-1a6d-a18a34d9662a@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bezüglich Julian Elischer's Nachricht vom 22.05.2017 09:52 (localtime):
> On 22/5/17 3:04 pm, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 21.05.2017 20:25
>> (localtime):
>>> Mk&bsd.ports.mk still tells:
>>> # PACKAGES - A top level directory where all packages go
>>> (rather than
>>> # going locally to each port).
>>> # Default: ${PORTSDIR}/packages
>>>
>>> Since r438901 (
>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=438901
>>>
>>> )
>> Actually, r438058 broke PACKAGES. For the records, see
>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218827
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>
>>
> has this been unbroken? We use this feature but are not on the head of
> the tree yet..
Nope, not fixed yet and I guess it won't happen, from what I read.
Reverting r438901 and r438058 locally is a suitable solution at the
moment, but this is going to change soon I fear. The commits seem to be
required to make ports pkg/poudriere compatible.
-harry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5922C2AB.1060008>