Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:01:06 +0100 From: Bruce Simpson <bms@incunabulum.net> To: Iain Hibbert <plunky@rya-online.net> Cc: "freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org" <freebsd-bluetooth@freebsd.org>, "alexei@raylab.com" <alexei@raylab.com> Subject: BlueZ dbus binding is device dependent Message-ID: <49E0DAE2.3030805@incunabulum.net> In-Reply-To: <49DF8C8C.5030006@incunabulum.net> References: <49D92E26.2030508@incunabulum.net> <bb4a86c70904061358l3983ed51m11265859a833f202@mail.gmail.com> <49DD40E2.5030403@incunabulum.net> <1239264003.862926.638.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org> <bb4a86c70904091013l2d7c2b77ic7f6988e6e7709f2@mail.gmail.com> <49DE4F44.8070707@incunabulum.net> <1239359436.893706.893.nullmailer@galant.ukfsn.org> <49DF8C8C.5030006@incunabulum.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
So, just to confirm, I read the code examples in this BlueZ Wiki article;
and it does indeed appear that the naming convention BlueZ uses in DBus
is BlueZ dependent:-
http://wiki.bluez.org/wiki/HOWTO/DiscoveringDevices
Hmmm! Whatever do we do about that.
BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49E0DAE2.3030805>