Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:37:06 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: palm/pilot-link needs to be fixed for matherr change (was Re: matherr disappeared?) Message-ID: <20050214023706.GA27347@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <1108348247.26515.17.camel@server.mcneil.com> References: <1108344209.2954.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> <20050214020127.GA44039@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <1108348247.26515.17.camel@server.mcneil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 06:30:47PM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote: > First of all, I do read current as I am subscribed. >=20 > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2005-February/046426= .html >=20 > Finally, that thread is related to tcl 8.0.5 for i386. I had no reason > to suspect it had anything to do with my situation as I have an amd64 > system with tcl-8.4.7 which compiled without any issue. Perhaps I > simply deleted it since I am not using i386. Many tcl-derived ports inherited the same bugs. > P.S. Aren't changes like that suppose to go in UPDATING? No, UPDATING is for special steps required for updating your ports. It doesn't address port bugs that are discovered; those go in a BROKEN tag in the port in question, if they can't be fixed immediately. Kris --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCEA7SWry0BWjoQKURAjdEAKCx0ysPtAIsCssbBqbvpYFZrNiNRQCfT9Ip oy0QAaWWtb3X2Dq81MVADtg= =Ks1a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050214023706.GA27347>