Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 11:29:21 +0200 (SAT) From: Tony Harverson <tony@panacea.insight.co.za> To: vitjok@fasts.com (Victor Rotanov) Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail... Message-ID: <199612170929.LAA25530@panacea.insight.co.za> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961217110236.16720A-100000@server.fasts.com> from "Victor Rotanov" at Dec 17, 96 11:04:07 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Tue, 17 Dec 1996, Snob Art Genre wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Dec 1996, Victor Rotanov wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > Why sendmail can't be replaced with something more secure by default? > > > I'd suggest Zmailer which can be fount at > > > ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/mail/zmailer > > > It is also seems to be faster than sendmail on high loads. > > > > Oh god, don't get the religious wars going again, *please*. > why? anything is more secure than sendmail, and zmailer is used on > highly loaded mail servers. Because the last time we tried this, the only thing we established was that all these mailing systems could keep up output at least fast enough to spam the FreeBSD-security mailing list with messages about how cool they are. T
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612170929.LAA25530>