Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:17:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, David Xu <bsddiy@21cn.com> Subject: Re: vm balance Message-ID: <200104172017.f3HKHsU06007@earth.backplane.com> References: <27001.987537763@critter>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
:>Note that I really don't care for using stable storeage as a hack
:>to deal with this sort of thing.
:
:Well, I have to admit that it is a pretty smart way of dealing with
:it for remote operations, but the trouble is that it prevents us from
:ever lowering their number again.
:
:If Matt can device a smart way to loose the soft reference in nfs,
:vnodes can be a truly dynamic thing.
:
:--
:Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
NFS uses vnodes the same way that VFS uses vnodes. If you solve the
problem for general VFS operation (namely *cache_lookup), you solve
the problem for NFS as well.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104172017.f3HKHsU06007>