Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:58:43 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: "Ganael LAPLANCHE" <martymac@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/deskutils/xneur Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/deskutils/xneur/files patch-configure patch-etc-Makefile.in Message-ID: <01343804@h30.sp.ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20110404092027.M23377@FreeBSD.org> (Ganael LAPLANCHE's message of "Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:23:32 %2B0200 (CEST)") References: <201104040826.p348QXDY066404@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110404085321.GA3051@FreeBSD.org> <20110404092027.M23377@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:23:32 +0200 (CEST) Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 08:53:21 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote > > Pardon, but how can PR submitted by maintainer be approved by timeout > > thereof? > This is a special situation : I had suggested several improvements over > the original PR, but have never received any answer from the maintainer. > So his first patch was (of course) approved, but mine has never been. > This is why I have also specified a timeout for this commit. > Am I wrong ? The common practice is to use [X], ex.: ----- - Update to 0.12.0 [1] - Convert PCRE option to a mandatory LIB_DEPENDS [1] - Fix or improve several OPTIONS handling and dependencies [1] - Remove useless CFLAGS patch [2] - Handle sample configuration file as advised in the handbook [2] PR: 155537 [1] Submitted by: Alex Keda <admin@lissyara.su> (maintainer) [1] Approved by: maintainer timeout (18 days) [2] ----- -- WBR, bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01343804>