Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:52:51 -0800 From: Qing Li <qingli@freebsd.org> To: "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r205024 - head/sys/net Message-ID: <9ace436c1003112352l3b2505ceq63d9c78954520497@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5ADB6F0D-11F1-4F9F-87A0-64F57063981E@freebsd.org> References: <201003111756.o2BHukJu042449@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1003112128020.97017@fledge.watson.org> <9ace436c1003111530s3bd0de9cq451671909fb6aa64@mail.gmail.com> <5ADB6F0D-11F1-4F9F-87A0-64F57063981E@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Is there any way we can pick up via an assertion that an interface driver= has failed to implement this functionality? This has never been a historic= requirement, so I suspect there are a lot of drivers floating around that = fail to meet the requirement. Also, is this for IFT_ETHER only, or also oth= er link types? > Not sure if I get the assertion suggestion. How would an assertion help her= e ? -- Qing
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9ace436c1003112352l3b2505ceq63d9c78954520497>