Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2022 00:56:53 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 261525] devel/apr1: Update to use databases/db18 (databases/db5 is EOL) Message-ID: <bug-261525-16115-XZdZZcqhrk@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-261525-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-261525-16115@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261525 Oliver Heesakkers <dev2@heesakkers.info> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dev2@heesakkers.info --- Comment #4 from Oliver Heesakkers <dev2@heesakkers.info> --- Would it make sense to switch to using ndbm as its default database support, while you're updating? Ndbm was added as an option in 2009 [1] after being requested in bug #83644, but (understandably) the port continued using BDB as its default. Considering the BDB18 license and it generally being an Oracle product, now might be a perfect time to switch to ndbm as the default in order to keep in line with the spirit of FreeBSD (if such a thing exists and I interpret it correctly). [1]: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/devel/apr1/Makefile?id=3D4877c5ead2c2= 9e59bebd51393e3d6eb48e50053f --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-261525-16115-XZdZZcqhrk>