Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 19:55:35 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: mdf@freebsd.org Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r221604 - head/usr.sbin/usbdump Message-ID: <201105071955.35305.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimi_Em60n9MZRTcgBDvycqH-pKL5g@mail.gmail.com> References: <201105071628.p47GSO16006145@svn.freebsd.org> <201105071836.00660.hselasky@c2i.net> <BANLkTimi_Em60n9MZRTcgBDvycqH-pKL5g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 07 May 2011 19:13:27 mdf@freebsd.org wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> wrote: > > On Saturday 07 May 2011 18:28:24 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > >> - Use memcpy() instead of bcopy(). > > > > - Use memset() instead of bzero(). > > Why? It usually falls through to the same code in libc. Is there > some standardization on memfoo versus bfoo here? Hi, I thought that memset() was a compiler builtin and bzero() optimised for larger amounts of data? --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201105071955.35305.hselasky>