Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:38:22 +0100 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: vd@FreeBSD.org Cc: Marcus Alves Grando <mnag@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, mux@freebsd.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/csup Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <1150972702.79359.16.camel@mayday.esat.net> In-Reply-To: <20060622101749.GA58621@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <200606211711.k5LHBGfr014825@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060622101749.GA58621@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 13:17 +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 05:11:16PM +0000, Marcus Alves Grando wrote:
> > mnag 2006-06-21 17:11:16 UTC
> >
> > FreeBSD ports repository
> >
> > Modified files:
> > net/csup Makefile distinfo
> > Log:
> > - Update to 20060318
> > - Fix build in tinderbox using ${OSVERSION} instead .if exists()
> >
> > Approved by: mux
> >
>
> % portupgrade /var/db/pkg/csup-20060313_1/
> ** Port marked as IGNORE: net/csup:
> is already in the base system
> % which csup
> /usr/local/bin/csup
> % ls -l /usr/bin/csup
> ls: /usr/bin/csup: No such file or directory
> % sysctl kern.osreldate
> kern.osreldate: 601100
> %
It's a bit unrelated but why one wouldn't want to have both csup from
base and ports? I don't want to upgrade my system just to have a recent
csup.
--
Florent Thoumie
flz@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Committer
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBEmnMeMxEkbVFH3PQRAkCZAJ9NXfL1zrny/UdZ9/JNkqxnA6yB3gCfet+H
n9SKqKF7g7Nz+8S1l6fQxEE=
=vNTH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1150972702.79359.16.camel>