Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Oct 2003 23:41:08 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        scottl@freebsd.org
Cc:        nate@root.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/acpica Makefile acpi_wakecode.S src/sys/i386/conf NOTES
Message-ID:  <20031029.234108.97396294.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20031029.222828.133432192.imp@bsdimp.com> <3FA0A683.40108@freebsd.org> <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

In message: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
            M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: The "general silliness of compiling SMP for all modules" was a design
: decision for SMPng made a long time ago.  That's why there's no longer
: a SMP kernel option.

Actually, I'm smoking crack here.  Forget I said it.

We do, however, don't use the lock prefix on UP kernels.  Instead,
modules call the atomic functions, rather than inlining them.

Warner


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031029.234108.97396294.imp>