Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 23:41:08 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: scottl@freebsd.org Cc: nate@root.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/acpica Makefile acpi_wakecode.S src/sys/i386/conf NOTES Message-ID: <20031029.234108.97396294.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20031029.222828.133432192.imp@bsdimp.com> <3FA0A683.40108@freebsd.org> <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com>
M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes:
: The "general silliness of compiling SMP for all modules" was a design
: decision for SMPng made a long time ago. That's why there's no longer
: a SMP kernel option.
Actually, I'm smoking crack here. Forget I said it.
We do, however, don't use the lock prefix on UP kernels. Instead,
modules call the atomic functions, rather than inlining them.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031029.234108.97396294.imp>