Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:54:42 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Ocaml or Unison port working for anyone? Message-ID: <20050609005442.GA10723@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050608203207.X12338@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050608203207.X12338@zoraida.natserv.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:52:40PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >>Why do some ports require i386? Instructions not supported by gcc in > >>AMD64? > > > >Non-portable assumptions in the code (e.g. sizeof(void *) == sizeof(int)) > > I had never looked at those error logs before but it seemed like the port > compiled and there were errors deleting some files. Since I could not > find any build errors tried to look at other report logs to see how > errors look, but the handfull I tried none had logs. :-( > > > >http://pointyhat.freebsd.org. > > I was looking at the "by error type vs build environment". How often is > that run? The date on top was from late May. > > Also on the "last run 5.X" many of the ports don't have any logs. What > does that mean? At first I thought maybe it meant they compiled ok, but > looking for ports I have compiled, none was found so the complete list > seems like it's broken ports. You probably want to look at where it says "look here to find the most recent error with your port" Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCp5NRWry0BWjoQKURAl2LAKD7OkpS/3qgAlQUxBri6VDZym3ltwCg5TcF qd0kc7rBeYWy+2juLtDmEuk= =hPu5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050609005442.GA10723>